A useful starting point
You can provide an accepted workflow export, inspect action-level findings, and give the destination configuration and testing to a team that understands the process.
Choose your source or delivery pathChoose an approach
Choose the approach that fits the work.
A migration can combine generated starting points, manual rebuilding, and process redesign. Compare what each approach asks of your team, then use a pilot to decide where it fits.
Analysis requires a free account. This is a planning comparison, not a measured savings claim or a ranking of other vendors.
Compare the responsibilities and tradeoffs.
| Decision | Assisted conversion with Flow Migrator | Manual Power Automate rebuild | Custom redevelopment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Useful when | You have an accepted Nintex export and want to assess mappings and generate a supported starting point. | You want to rebuild a workflow directly in Power Automate, including behavior that needs a different design. | The business process, user experience, or integration architecture needs substantial redesign. |
| Starting material | Source export, coverage findings, generated draft, and supported packages where exportable. | Source behavior, requirements, and a manually designed destination flow. | Agreed requirements, architecture, data model, integrations, and a delivery plan. |
| Work your team completes | Review mappings; configure destinations and connections; resolve gaps; import and test. | Interpret the source; design and build the logic; configure connections; test and document. | Design, implement, integrate, test, deploy, and establish support for the chosen solution. |
| Fit to check | Accepted format, action mappings, trigger behavior, dependencies, connector requirements, and destination limits. | Builder skills, source documentation, connector suitability, maintainability, and available project time. | Business case, implementation expertise, governance, operating cost, and long-term ownership. |
| Cost to include | Export access plus configuration, rebuilding, import, testing, and destination licensing where required. | Builder and reviewer effort, testing, support, and destination licensing where required. | Discovery, design, development, integration, testing, ongoing operation, and platform licensing. |
| Evidence before scaling | A representative pilot with recorded generated output, manual changes, import results, and execution tests. | A working pilot that passes agreed behavior and maintainability checks. | An approved design and a tested slice of the proposed solution, with delivery risks recorded. |
Where Flow Migrator fits.
Resolve the fit question first
Your input format is outside the accepted formats, essential behavior has no suitable mapping, or you need a redesigned process, forms, or content migration. Define that work before buying export capacity.
Check the current compatibility referenceHave a finding you need to interpret?
Bring the flagged actions and the behavior you need to preserve. We can discuss the scope question before you choose export capacity.
Ask about an analysis